bit.ly The Easy Street Casino Dispute; a mathematical investigation into the scam sportsbook. Michael Shackleford also known as the Wizard of Odds, follows up with Judie Russell on the EasyStreet Casino dispute. Since the interview with cory1111 on April 6th, TheRX Head Moderator Wilheim published his final report with the help of an unnamed third party expert. The conclusion advised EasyStreet not to pay cory the 000 he won at Easy Street Casino playing Jacks or Better. The findings were criticized as being badly worded and worse, inconsistent with probability theory as well as the facts supporting cory’s case. Michael Shackelford is a professional actuary who has made a career of analyzing casino games. He runs the numbers on new games for casinos and game developers and has helped design many of the popular slot machines on the Internet. He is currently a contributing writer for Casino Player magazine, formerly an Adjunct Professor of Casino Math at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, and the author of the book Gambling 102. You can visit his website and forum at www.wizardofodds.com . Below are the questions that were asked in the interview. Question 1: So The RX “expert’s” report seems to be misusing mathematics to confuse the general public. It stated that “Cory1111 defied all odds and hit three royals in 8862 hands.” However when further investigated it is obvious that the Rx were selective sampling by excluded all days where cory did not hit a royal and …